FUJICOLOR PRO S PROFESSIONAL is an ISO film speed daylight-type color efficiency with other films in the FUJICOLOR PRO series. FUJICOLOR PRO S . request a visual (manual) inspection of your film. • Film fogging . FUJICOLOR PRO NS PROFESSIONAL is an ISO films peed the FUJICOLOR PRO series. Features . request a visual (manual) inspection of your film. The newly developed and totally repackaged Fujicolor Pro series delivers on the promise of achieving smoother makes Pro S exceedingly easy to use.

Language:English, Spanish, French
Published (Last):25.07.2016
Distribution:Free* [*Registration Required]
Uploaded by: BREANA

60791 downloads 134192 Views 10.55MB PDF Size Report

Fuji Pro 160s Pdf

in PDF format for Fujicolor Professional Films Replaces Fujicolor Pro S iso 35mm x 36 exp. - 20 Roll Pro Pack, item #, discontinued by the. Brochure for Pro S | PDF - KB |; terney.info-Value Fujicolor/Fujichrome Brochure Brochure for Pro S | PDF - 3 MB |. Not what you were looking for?. Fujicolor Pro C Professional is an ISO film speed daylight-type colour negative film designed for professional use, featuring a gradation design.

Although you can use it in stand-alone mode, most photographers use it as a plug-in in Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop. Getting that look that suits your particular image is always a challenge for many photographers, and this software makes it easy by providing loads of film emulations presets as a starting point. Preset browser now also offers a list view as well as optional thumbnails for a more visual experience. New primary control panel, containing sliders to tweak exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, clarity, vibrance and saturation for faster editing. Now supports Apple retina displays.

Fujicolor Pro 160S

In colour photography, these filters will add the specified colour tone across the entire picture. Using chemicals, the coloration of an image is changed.

Split toning uses multiple tones in this development process. The Lens Warp simulates the distortion caused by lenses at the edges of the image. Focus tab The Grain tab Modern cameras use higher ISO values for increased sensitivity to light, introducing different kinds of ugly digital noise.

Since we are used to seeing this in images, some photographers prefer adding some texture to their images for a more analogue look. But all are very customizable, and you can now even import your own.

Light leaks and texture effects do look beautiful, very realistic.

So my new quest to find improved films for shooting began. In the subsequent weeks I have gone a little over board with my ordering of films and now have over rolls of various brands either on the way to me currently or have recently arrived and are now being stored safely in my fridge. The first 3 types to arrive that I have really had any time to get out and shoot have been good old Ilford Xp2 black and white c41 process film, I really enjoyed shooting this rolls, despite having some problems with the local lab scanning my negs incorrectly and generally not really taking too much care with the film, so there are some artifacts in some of the images.

I have also managed to get out and shoot a roll of Kodak Ektar… Wow, this stuff is something special!

I had to spend a fair bit for this gorgeous film, but it truly renders more like a superb slide film as opposed to color negative film, it really is something else. It was however expired in however the seller assured it had been cold stored and was fine.

I asked around and found that expired film if cold stored can last years past the expiration date, so I took a chance knowing this was decent film and ordered 30 rolls. I was pleasantly surprised by the results I got back last weekend. While not quite as saturated as the Kodak ektar nor quite as fine grained, it is still in another league to typical 35mm colour negative film.

The Great Big Lomography Film Bible: Colour Negative · Lomography

I think that some differences of color is responsible from my varying film processing methods. I am currently trying to keep my film processing at a single lab for consistency.

Some time ago I compared the two film's specifications from their makers, one thing I noted was that reciprocity starts at very modest length exposures on the Fuji film. I don't particularly discern anything jumping out at me colorwise in my photographs which are landscape. In my current frame of mind as I move toward digital printing and out of my chemical darkroom - I am guessing that I could always desaturate in Photoshop as being preferable to trying to boost color that wasn't there to begin with.

Oh no, there's been an error

Porta NC is a nice one too. Henry Ambrose Jul, They are both really good films and both scan well. Neither is color accurate in the strict sense of the word - not like EPP or such. You will be interpreting color with any color negative film. Match the scan to the scene you saw and its accurate! I found either to work about as well at longer exposures.

But I think when I tested them side by side I only shot up to about 30 seconds. I've shot NPS up to several minutes with and without multiple flash pops to fill and gotten excellent scans. Fuji says NPS is not for suited long exposures but I have found otherwise.

Related articles:

Copyright © 2019 terney.info.
DMCA |Contact Us