But ordinarily we see that love becomes attachment, and instead of freeing us it makes us more bound. So tell us something about attachment and freedom. Osho on Love, Freedom and Aloneness - Free download as Word Doc .doc), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Osho, one of the greatest spiritual thinkers of the twentieth century, explores the connections between ourselves and others in Love, Freedom, and Aloneness.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Science & Research|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration Required]|
It's only been five days but I miss you like it's been five In the car Kitty keeps saying “I hate P.S. I Still Lo Rich Dad's Guide to Financial Freedom by Robert. Love, Freedom and Aloneness Download at => https://readpdfonlinebook terney.info Love, Freedom and Aloneness pdf. Love, Freedom, and Aloneness book. Read reviews from the world's largest community for readers. In today's world, freedom is our basic condition, and.
I cannot even decide whether it is handsome or ugly. I think it is ugly because I have been told so. He eventually starts to think he does not even exist: "My existence was beginning to cause me some concern. Was I a mere figment of the imagination? After meeting with him, Anny makes it clear that she has changed a considerable amount and must go on with her life.
Antoine clings to the past, hoping that she may want to redefine their relationship, but he is ultimately rejected by her. Ogier P. Highly disciplined, he has spent hundreds of hours reading at the local library. He often speaks to Roquentin and confides in him that he is a socialist. At the end of the novel he is revealed to be a pedophile. It is widely assumed   that "Bouville" in the novel is a fictional portrayal of Le Havre , where Sartre was living and teaching in the s as he wrote it.
The critic William V. Spanos has used  Sartre's novel as an example of "negative capability", a presentation of the uncertainty and dread of human existence so strong that the imagination cannot comprehend it.
But, on the other hand, the words are there like traps to arouse our feelings and to reflect them towards us Thus, the writer appeals to the reader's freedom to collaborate in the production of the work. Hayden Carruth wonders  if there are unrecognized layers of irony and humor beneath the seriousness of Nausea: "Sartre, for all his anguished disgust, can play the clown as well, and has done so often enough: a sort of fool at the metaphysical court.
Sartre described  the stream of consciousness technique as one method of moving the novel from the era of Newtonian physics forward into the era of Einstein 's theory of general relativity , in terms of writing style. He saw this as crucial because he felt that "narrative technique ultimately takes us back to the metaphysics of the novelist. From the psychological point of view, Antoine Roquentin could be seen  as an individual suffering from depression , and the Nausea itself as one of the symptoms of his condition.
Unemployed, living in deprived conditions, lacking human contact, being trapped in fantasies about the 18th century secret agent he is writing a book about, he establishes Sartre's oeuvre as a follow-up to Dostoevsky 's Crime and Punishment , or Rilke 's The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge in search of a precise description of schizophrenia. However, Roquentin's predicament is not simply depression or mental illness , although his experience has pushed him to that point.
Sartre presents Roquentin's difficulties as arising from man's inherent existential condition. His seemingly special situation returning from travel, reclusiveness , which goes beyond the mere indication of his very real depression, is supposed to induce in him and in the reader a state that makes one more receptive to noticing an existential situation that everyone experiences, but may not be sensitive enough to let become consciously noticeable.
Roquentin undergoes a strange metaphysical experience that estranges him from the world. His problems are not merely a result of personal insanity, which would be deprived of larger significance.
Rather, like the characters in the Dostoevsky and Rilke novels, he is a victim of larger ideological, social, and existential forces that have brought him to the brink of insanity. Sartre's point in Nausea is to comment on our universal reaction to these common external predicaments.
It is scarcely possible to read seriously in contemporary literature, philosophy, or psychology without encountering references to Roquentin's confrontation with the chestnut tree, for example, which is one of the sharpest pictures ever drawn of self-doubt and metaphysical anguish.
Transcendence and providence were invented by man. Every being is meaningless "in itself". There is no God.
But the experience through nausea ends up taking a positive turn: if God doesn't exist, then everything becomes possible. And that's how, with despair, true optimism begins.
At the time of the novel's release, Camus was a reviewer for an Algiers left-wing daily. Camus told a friend that he "thought a lot about the book" and it was "a very close part of [himself]. Mattey , a philosopher rather than a novelist like Camus, flatly describes  Nausea and others of Sartre's literary works as "practically philosophical treatises in literary form.
He writes that Nausea "may well be Sartre's best book for the very reason that in it the intellectual and the creative artist come closest to being conjoined. He writes firmly  that Sartre, "is not content, like some philosophers, to write fable, allegory, or a philosophical tale in the manner of Candide ; he is content only with a proper work of art that is at the same time a synthesis of philosophical specifications.
The humanity of man consists in the For-itself , the masculine component by which we choose, make projects, and generally commit ourselves to a life of action. The element of masculine protest, to use Adler 's term, is strong throughout Sartre's writings Mattey elaborates further  on the positive, redeeming aspect of the seemingly bleak, frustrating themes of existentialism that are so apparent in Nausea: "Sartre considered the subjectivity of the starting-point for what a human is as a key thesis of existentialism.
I wish everyone around me would read this book and just be happy. And then share this happiness with others because life is too short. Nov 27, Jeannie Mancini rated it it was amazing. I have very recently been introduced to Osho.
Within just a few pages my heart started racing and my own t I have very recently been introduced to Osho. Halfway through I was totally enamored, enthralled and excited, and soon jumped on the internet to download as many of his books I could afford in one fell swoop. Osho is simply amazing in his ability to make all people who have ever felt alienated from the people around them, finally feel at ease with themselves.
Not in a selfish egotistical way, but in a way that can bring joy into our lives the way WE choose to live it. And to live not by the rules of the church, our parents, our kids, or our peers. Letting God let us live our own lives in our own way is an underlying theme here. Never in all the thousands of books I have read in my life has anyone spoke to me about God in a way I could accept or grasp. I loved his teachings of God, his philosophy of who or what God is or can be in each of our lives.
He speaks of the church, of priests, of Gurus, Buddhas and other various deities from around the world in ways you can let seep in without fear of all of it threatening you to lean one way or the other, or to heaven forbid choose one at all.
His open honest banter and non-preaching way of opening a reader up to God in ways one can understand or want to open up to, was a welcoming breath of fresh air for this reader! And, Osho has a wonderful sense of humor to keep a light air swirling around his wise words of wisdom!
He tells us that without it we wither and die, we often let outside social views and religious dogma either stifle us, guilt trip us, or zoom us to the opposite direction bringing stress and chaos over this one simple human joy that should just be lived and cherished for what it is. Never denied or repressed by anyone in our lives.
I truly loved his views and opinions on what works in love relationships and what does not. All of it was simple common sense, so easy to intake, so loving and joyful. Honesty, being open to feeling fear and getting beyond it, can give us the ability to shed the pre-ordained dos and dont's we learned as children growing up as to what is proper and not allowed, what was considered dirty and shameful.
All of it fades into dust as you read this fabulous book and let it all fall away into what you yourself want out of life and how to accomplish it. There are not enough stars in the rating system on this book in my eyes. This one will sit on the nightstand to read over and over and over…. Stay tuned for more Osho book reviews! I think I found a new hero! View 1 comment. Jun 21, Victoria rated it it was amazing Shelves: I loved this book.
It was hard to understand at first I think you really have to approach it with a completely open mind and just really listen to what he's saying. I got a little disinterested when he went on a 'we should all live in small communes' tangent only because it's basically impossible to even imagine it in today's world , but otherwise his anecdotes were amusing and full of very wise insights that only further drove his points home. Everything in the title of this book you will co I loved this book.
Everything in the title of this book you will come to learn and understand by the end of it, but not in the traditional sense. In a way, you have to un-learn everything you thought you knew up until now and rebuild from the ground up. Love, freedom and aloneness all work together as part of a greater whole, and Osho explains these dynamics and relationships in an easy and comprehensive way. His tone is soothing and poetic, patient and soft.
I highlighted many passages in this book, and I have no doubt that I'll be returning to it for reference again and again. I think it's one of those books you have to read a few times to really grasp the concepts fully. If you're really looking to save a relationship from the garbage disposal, I think it requires a thorough reading by both parties, with open discussion throughout.
Even if you're not in a relationship, it teaches the importance of being alone and how to find comfort in it, instead of sadness and loneliness. I would refer this book to anyone I know who has an open mind to receive it and will undoubtedly be reading more of Osho's books in the future. Mar 13, Janet rated it really liked it Recommends it for: It's quite repetitive. It's at times a bit eccentric. It's not really well written. Although this was explained in the "About the Author" section at the end.
This book was NOT "written", but transcribed from 35 years' worth of Osho's extemporaneous talks, which explains the repetition and average writing. It's definitely not for the conservative, especially Christian, set. That being said How awesome to have my pers It's quite repetitive.
How awesome to have my personal but oft invalidated beliefs and natural tendencies validated by someone with the wisdom and experience to back it up! First, I've resisted organized religion Osho supports this. Although he brought to light that I have erred by not first loving myself. By the time I closed the back cover, I had learned the necessity of meditation and aloneness in one's life. They are what enable you to love yourself And, I was blissfully heartened that aloneness and love are not only complimentary, but they each cannot exist without the other.
Just as my intuitive self felt, I've started walking on a wonderful path. It is my fervent hope that in a few months, I'll be able to tell people that Osho is the one who got me to stick with meditation! Sep 26, Jason marked it as to-read. A dog is born a dog, will live like a dog, will die like a dog; there is no freedom This is where man is totally different. This is the dignity of man, his specialness in existence, his uniqueness. Yes, he wi i have this book on order and wish i had the presence of mind to preview it more extensively before downloading it.
Yes, he will become aged, old, but he will not become more intelligent. Dec 19, Ursa rated it liked it Shelves: If you ask me if I enjoy this book, the answer is no. It made me uncomfortable, it cemented some of my knowledge and believes and it shook some others. But if you ask me if this book is a good read, I would say yes, for the same reason. To me, a good read doesn't always comfort and provide you all the answers that you readily agree with.
A good read makes you feel and think, it makes you question your prior knowledge; a good read might contain theses that you vehemently disagree with, and yet can If you ask me if I enjoy this book, the answer is no. A good read makes you feel and think, it makes you question your prior knowledge; a good read might contain theses that you vehemently disagree with, and yet can't easily dismiss.
And so what it ultimately offers you is an incentive to do your own research--look further and dig deeper. In that sense, Osho's Love, Freedom and Aloneness is a good read. Frustrated by the translation I was reading, I went to do a research on my own and learnt that Osho himself has never written any book. Everything that has been published and circulated so far was merely a transcription of his lectures in his life time.
So be wary when you approach "his books". I wish I could have listened to the man in Indian. To summarize this book, Osho believes that people have been mistaking lust and possession with love, and that we should have started from loving ourselves first and foremost. Be content and happy with your aloneness before you want to be with others. Osho opposes legislate marriage as he believes it shackles people together by social obligation and duties, turning 'home' and 'family' into 'prison' for people who are no longer in love with one another.
On the other hand, he doesn't criticize sex or lust, he sees sexual urges as normal, and lust is a phase that comes before Love, with the capital L. The ultimate Love comes from loving yourself and will naturally overflow to others.
Osho encourages us to experience, to sate our physical desires but also understand that desire, lust, want are phases one needs to transcend in order to find Love. I like his perspective on the interrelationship among marriage, freedom and aloneness. As for the rest of it, I'm gonna leave them aside for now. One thing I can thoroughly disagree with him is the proclaim that human being is the only species capable of changes and intelligent maturity, "a dog is born a dog and dies as a dog, it will get old but its nature remains the same", something along that line.
I also don't care for the anecdote in which he bonded with a tree and it died when he left. Anyone who claims human being as superiority always give me pause and makes me question their level of enlightenment. Still, I do think Osho had a lot of insights to offer. Lastly, this book merely gives you ideas, and a few suggestions at best.
It does not point out a solid path. It is not a self-help book with a manual. Oct 28, Nugraha rated it it was amazing. This book challenged me to re-question my paradigm as well as provided so much insights and ideas to contemplate on.
One of the powerful things I found from this piece of profound work was the statement "one is enough unto oneself, and one doesn't require anything else". Thanks Osho. Jan 24, SJ Loria rated it did not like it.
He's a spiritual charlatan and convicted criminal. He makes some interesting points about relationships. Be wary the advice of theorists instead of practitioners. I had to see if he was a monk or lived a normal life. Answer, monk. Not in the traditional sense, based on the way he writes I have no doubt he seduced many a hippie back to his hut to show them the energy of sex. But I had no idea the egregious greed and level of crime this guy was actually involved in. Criticism is the highest form of autobiography, as Oscar Wilde said.
I must say, there were several points where I thought, exactly right man, perfectly put and other points where I was like you are totally and completely wrong here. Be wary of theorists, be wary of gurus, be wary of self-proclaimed mystics. Writing is a carefully calculated art. Speaking with no real notes or agenda leads to some good statements and some wandering ones too. OK, trying to once again forget this guy is a total and utter joke so hard to do after seeing a photo of his Rolls Royce driving by the throngs of identically dressed people at his resort!
But, what are some of the things he says which are actually interesting? One cannot love unless one knows your own silence. That is the difference between a thing and a person. The furniture in the room is the same, but the man and the woman, they are no more the same. Explore again, start again. Go on searching and seeking each other, finding new ways of loving each other, finding new ways of being with each other.
Then love is a constant adventure. Love cannot be jealous, because love cannot possess. It is ugly, the very idea that you possess somebody because you love. You possess somebody — it means you have killed somebody and turned him into a commodity. Only things can be possessed.
Love gives freedom. Love is freedom. It is not possible if you go on changing partners very often. It is as if you go on changing a tree from one place to another, then another; then it never grows roots anywhere. To grow roots, a tree needs to remain in one place.
Then it goes deeper; then it becomes stronger. Intimacy is good, and to remain in one commitment is beautiful, but the basic necessity is love. If a tree is rooted in a place where there are only rocks and they are killing the tree, then it is better to remove it.
Remain true to life — remove the tree, because now it is going against life. And nobody can love on order. Love is a spontaneous phenomenon. Nothing can be done about it. If you do anything, you will create a pseudo phenomenon, an acting. In fact, it is because of your love that you have made it possible for me to be alone.
You will not say that you have been rejected, that your love has not been received and welcomed.
You will respect her decision to be alone for a few days. In fact, you will be happy! Your love was so much that she is feeling empty; now she needs rest to become full again. This is intelligence. How did they change you? Love can only happen through freedom and in conjunction with a deep respect for ourselves and the other. Is it possible to be alone and not lonely?