POTENTIAL. HOW TO PREDICT YOUR MAXIMUM MUSCULAR. BODYWEIGHT AND MEASUREMENTS. CASEY BUTT, PH.D. terney.info Most recently I read Casey Butt's book Your Muscular Potential How To . Casey Butt's book can be found in pdf format here: Your Muscular. YOUR MUSCULAR POTENTIAL: HOW TO PREDICT YOUR MAXIMUM Written in a clear and factual manner, this page e-book (pdf format) will give you.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration Required]|
From the ancient Greek artists to modern day bodybuilders, from aesthetic ideals of human proportions to haters and from controlled, statistical predictions to. Greek God Muscle Building Program | Greg O'Gallagher Page | 2 Contents You will always be lifting near your true potential and strength and muscle gains . PDF | Cellular swelling, often referred to as "the pump," has been long-term adaptive responses. T his. paper will explore the potential hyper-.
I think it was Dorian Yates that said you should take advice on a topic from those who are naturally bad at it.
People are inclined to do the opposite. They copy the chest and biceps routines of Schwarzenegger and the leg routine of Tom Platz. Take advice from the hardgainers and people built like yourself, people that had to overcome their limitations instead of following their talent.
It allows you to identify weak body parts and measure your structural balance. Those are arguably the most important and especially the most practical predictors, but there are many more signs. Take a look at the list of of positive predictors of your maximum muscular potential below. The higher you score on any of these variables, the higher your potential.
Your birth weight. The amount of lean body mass you carried before you started training. The most gifted individuals were already large before they ever touched a weight.
The fullness of your muscle bellies. Longer muscles of course have more mass potential than shorter ones. Development of secondary sex characteristics, like a square face and lots of body hair.
This is indicative of high testosterone. Your second to fourth digit length ratio. The shorter your index finger and the longer your ring finger, the higher your prenatal exposure to testosterone.
These are not just fun facts. Think about how most professional strength sport athletes look. They tend to have large, masculine builds. The short version of this article: if you would not look out of place in this group, you have great potential in strength sports.
If you scored badly on these indices and now feel depressed… man up. Talent is genetic. America show. Now, it is possible that some of those people used steroids.
However, we also know top American lifters and bodybuilders experimented with testosterone as of Finally, we know testosterone use likely began as early as the late s among Soviet lifters, considering the institutionalized use by their weightlifting team at the Olympics.
Applying moderate skepticism and accepting the winners as natural, the average FFMI is These means are not much different from the group mean. In fact, the authors analyzed the FFMIs to determine if they were increasing over time. America winners competing before steroids existed. America winners from , which averaged It is likely that the measured and predicted body fat percentages were off by a bit which would affect fat free mass estimates, and thus FFMI.
FFMIs are likely higher for fatter individuals. Interestingly, the highest fat free mass reported in the literature was from a sumo wrestler. So, what can we get from this study? Steroids seemed to give people an average increase of about 3 FFMI points the average for the 83 steroid users was That corresponds to about 7.
We know an FFMI of at least In all likelihood, Delinger FFMI of 28 was drug-free as well in , but if you want to be super skeptical, you can disregard him. An FFMI cutoff of 25, or a cutoff of height in cm minus would imply that some highly gifted drug-free athletes were, in fact, on drugs.
In that case, what are the better options? His idea is that the amount of muscle you can gain is limited by how much bone you have. But fill both cases with books and suddenly the little bit of extra width on the broader bookcase translates to a considerable amount of weight. Such is the case with the human skeleton. Five-to-one, then, is a general limit of the human muscle bookcase.
The limit for women is closer to 4.